1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation#5 "Staff threaten the clients while in care." LPA interviewed the 17 clients and all clients denied the allegation. All clients reported staff are nice to them and no staff ever threatened them. LPA interviewed staff and all denied the allegation and stated that there's no staff ever threatened clients or being mean to clients, only clients were being mean to them. Based on interviews and observations, although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation#6 "Staff disclose clients personal information" LPA interviewed 17 clients and all clients denied the allegation and reported staff never disclosed their personal information. LPA interviewed staff and all denied the allegation and reported they would never did it, its HIPPA law and violate the clients' right. Based on interviews, ahough the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Allegation#7 "Staff mishandles clients medications while in care " LPA interviewed 17 clients and 15 out of 17 clients denied the allegation and reported staff never mishandled their medication. The staff always gave them medication on time and staff always on top of their medication by refilling with the pharmacy or calling the doctor. LPA also interviewed staff and all denied the allegation and reported staff are always on top of clients medication and staff also reported they had been handled clients' medication for many years and they know how to do it. For refilling clients' medication, staff reported that they usually call before the medication has one week left. LPA also reviewed five (5) clients medication and they are seemed accurate and updated. Based on interviews and observations, although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Based on the interviews and the investigation, it appears that there was not sufficient evidence to support the allegation, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore all the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted, a copy of the report and appeal right was provided to the assistant administrator Andrew DeVera. |