1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (12) of (12) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. LPA was not provided with information as to which clients S2 was buying drugs from. LPA did not observe drugs in the facility during the physical plant tour. Review of facility files did not show there are clients who sell drugs in the facility. Based on LPA's interviews conducted, Observations and records reviewed; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
In regards to the allegation, "Facility staff speak inappropriately to residents" it was alleged that on 2/18/21 S2 entered the hallways where C1 was located and began to speak inappropriately to C1. (5) of (5) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (12) of (12) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. S2 denied that the incident ever occurred and would not make sense. There were no witnesses to the incident and no client interviewed showed that the incident occurred. Clients interviewed did not show that S2 speaks inappropriately to clients in care. Based on LPA's interviews conducted and observations; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. An exit Interview was conducted and a hardcopy was provided. |