1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Facilities LIC602 dated 6/17/21. LPA also conducted a tour of the facility which included client rooms and restrooms and the outside of the facility. LPA observed facility gate locks.
The investigation revealed the following: In regard to the allegation, Resident Eloped from Facility, it is alleged that there is a lack of client supervision at the facility and due to that C1 eloped from the facility and facility staff lied about the incident. Allegedly staff reported that C1 was just down the street when in fact C1 was a few blocks away. Date of elopement is unknown. Interview conducted with Administrator San Diego and DSP RJ Villasenor revealed that C1 did elope from the facility on 6/30/21. Staff stated that they were enough facility on schedule on 6/30/21, as there always is, and that C1 was able to elope when staff were tending to other clients and the other staff on schedule was outside of the facility taking care of some laundry. Administrator San Diego stated that he immediately reported the incident as it happened to all required parties which were C1's FM, Harbor Regional Center and Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) on 6/30/21 the date of the incident. Administrator also indicated that C1 was a new placement and had tried to elope a number of times during the initial adjustment period after the move in. Interview with DSP Villasenor revealed that when he noticed that C1 was not in their room he immediately alerted the other staff on schedule and they began looking for C1. DSP stated that he went outside to look around the facility surroundings and when he looked down the street he noticed that there was a police car so he immediately ran down the street to see if C1 was there. DSP Villasenor got to the corner store and when he went in the store he saw C1 sitting down eating some chips and the police officers notified him that the store employees called them due to not knowing where C1 lived. C1 was brought back to facility and a body check was conducted and no bruising, scratches or anything of concern were noted. Administrator stated that staff ensured that all facility doors were properly locked and that door alarms were properly working. Administrator stated that he additionally had a bell installed in C1's bedroom door as an additional manual alert just in case the battery operated door alarms happened to not be functioning. C2-4 are all non-verbal clients and C1 is not longer a client of the facility. LPA Gonzalez reviewed C1's Behavior Assessment which states that C1 was able to unlock doors when not constantly supervised. One target behavior noted on Assessment is elopement.
Based on interviews conducted with facility staff and review of documents, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above stated allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Michael San Diego. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided to Administrator San Diego. |