1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | According to Licensee the facility has pest control company on-call. Last pest control visit did not observe any pest in the exterior and interior of the facility. LPA Vaid closed light in bathroom and waited two minutes in the dark and then turned on the light, no cockroaches were observed in the bathrooms. LPA Vaid checked for pests under the kitchen sink cabinets and did not observe any pests. Based upon observations made and interviews conducted the findings indicate that, although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation: Licensee did not ensure facility was maintained in good repair. It is alleged that the facility is not maintained in good repair and the plumbing is causing toilets to become backed up and not flush clients’ bowel movements. (3) of (3) staff interviewed denied this allegation. (1) of (4) clients interviewed could not corroborate this allegation. According to the administrator, plumbing in the toilets is good. A client whose stool is very hard at times and does not flush down becomes struck in the toilet bowl. Staff have been instructed as part of their duty is to remove and dispose of bowel movement using double gloves. The client has had their medication adjusted, however due to clients’ behavior and other medications administered the client has had a couple of toileting incidents, noted and communicated to regional center coordinator who is aware of clients ongoing toileting issue. LPA Vaid was able to flush both toilets without incident. Based upon observations and interviews conducted the findings indicate that, although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation: Licensee did not ensure facility cleanliness was maintained. It is alleged the facility is not maintained with cleanliness and dust is accumulating near medications, and the facility van was not cleaned after client had urinated in the van. (3) of (3) staff interviewed deny this allegation. (1) of (4) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. According to the staff cleaning is performed daily when clients are at their day program, night cleaning is done by sweeping, mopping and dusting when clients are asleep. LPA Vaid did not observe dust in the medication cabinet and no mal odor of urine from the facility van. Licensee showed proof of van detailing bill charge dated 08/30/25. LPA Vaid observed staff cleaning clients’ bedrooms and bathrooms while clients’ they are at day program. Based upon observations, interviews conducted, the findings indicate that, although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. CONTINUED ON 9099C......... |