1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the course of this investigation, LPA also interviewed Client #3 (C-3) and Client #4 (C-4) and Staff #3 (S-3) and Staff #4 (S-4). LPA left a message for Staff #5 (S-5) for a return call. LPA was unable to interview Client #1 (C-1) as C-1 is non-verbal. LPA also spoke to the Quality Assurance Representative from San Gabriel Pomona Regional Center and was informed that their investigation findings are “inconclusive”.
Allegation: Staff physically abused resident. It has been alleged that staff hit a client during a doctor’s appointment. Per staff interviews, on 09/16/25, C-1 had a medical appointment. Per S-1 and S-2 interviews, C-1 had behavioral episodes during this medical appointment. Interviewed staff indicated that C-1 began having behaviors when the medical assistant was attempting to administer C-1 with a COVID test (swab). Per interviews, C-1 became physically aggressive towards staff (grabbing and scratching) and staff redirected C-1 a couple times. Due to C-1’s on-going behavior, S-1 instructed S-2 to take C-1 back to the facility van as C-1 has a tendency of grabbing items and throwing them at others. S-1 and S-2 denied hitting/punching C-1. Interviewed staff indicated that staff do not hit (including punching) clients. Interviewed staff indicated that they have not witnessed nor received any complaints/concerns pertaining to this matter. Client interviews revealed that staff do not hit clients and have no concerns. Interviews do not corroborate this allegation.
Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident's medical appointment was completed. It has been alleged that C-1's medical appointment was not completed. Per S-1 interview, on 09/16/25, C-1 completed their appointment. Per S-1 interview, the medical personnel provided S-1 with C-1’s preparation instructions for C-1 upcoming procedure prior to leaving the doctor’s office. Per S-1, S-1 was waiting for C-1’s medical office to call S-1 and provide a date for C-1’s scheduled procedure (pending insurance approval). Interview does not corroborate this allegation.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to Elizabeth Stacy.
|