1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per the Administrator, the client initially did not want to apply the treatment but later completed the 2 rounds as indicated on the physician’s order. Administrator informed LPA that the client refused to apply the cream to certain parts of the body such as the leg and private area during the treatment. The Direct Care Staff who assisted the client with applying the cream stated that the client did the treatment twice and has not seen any more lice. Per the housekeeper, rooms are cleaned daily and no lice or bugs were seen. Staff stated they have been encouraging the client to shower more often and to keep up with good hygiene due to going out in the community. Seven (7) out of eight (8) clients have not seen or heard about client having lice at the facility. LPA inspected Client #1’s room and did not observe any lice. However, during the interview with Client #1 today, client still complained of itchiness and reddish bite marks were observed on the stomach area.
Based on LPA observations and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1), are being cited on the attached LIC9099D.
An exit interview was conducted. The Plan of Corrections were reviewed and developed with the Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. |