1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed staff, staff 1 – staff 6 (S-1 – S-6). LPA asked, does staff ensure that residents rooms are clean. Of those interviewed 4 out of 6 stated yes and 2 answered something other than yes or no. LPA interviewed client 2 – client 7 (C-2 – C-7). LPA asked clients, if staff make sure that their room is clean. Of those interviewed, 6 out of 6 answered, yes.
Based on observations, information gathered and reviewed, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated.
Allegation: Staff did not ensure the lights were not in disrepair in resident's room
The details of the complaint alleged that the lights were not working in C1’s room. During the tour of the facility, LPA Shirley and S5 attempted to inspect room 206. LPA Shirley turned the light switch on and observed that the lights were not working. LPA observed the light switch in the up position which indicated the lights should be on. LPA Shirley observed that the windows were blackened with what appeared to be black paint.
LPA interviewed staff, staff 1 – staff 6 (S-1 – S-6). LPA asked, does staff ensure that the lighting in the rooms work. Of those interviewed 4 out of 6 stated yes and 2 answered something other than yes or no. LPA interviewed client 2 – client 7 (C-2 – C-7). LPA asked clients, if the lights in their rooms work. Of those interviewed, 6 out of 6 answered yes.
Based on observations, information gathered and reviewed, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated.
Con'd on 9099-C |