1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Program Director and 4 out of 4 staff interviewed confirmed the allegation of not meeting client to staff ratio. 6 out of 7 clients interviewed denied the allegations. 1 out of 7 clients interviewed stated not knowing if the facility is short staffed. However, all clients stated being helped by staff when needed and feel safe at the facility. All staff interviewed stated the facility is short staffed and staffing ratios were not met in previous instances. The program director stated that to ensure that they are complaint with client to staff ratio, the program director and assistant director are on the floor to help staff. The program director provided documentation that the facility was operating on the 4 clients to 1 staff ratio on the day of the visit. Program director also stated that there are working on additional staff. However, interviews conducted with 4 out of 4 staff confirmed that client to staff ratios have not been met. Also having the program director being part of the floor staff can potentially affect his administrative duties. Program director confirmed that there were times when the client to staff ratios were not met.
Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted, record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 3 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview held and a copy of the report and Appeal Rights were provided to the Program Director Amiel Salgado.
|