1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 12/19/23, Licensing Program Analyst-LPA Alfonso Iniguez received a phone call from Westside Regional Center QA Specialist (W#2) regarding (C#1) 's complaint investigation. LPA Iniguez asked (W#2) if they believed (C#1) 's home could offer the level of care (C#1) needs now. (W#2) stated no, (C#1) 's current home cannot provide higher care. In addition, (W#2) stated that (C#1) was put on respite for a temporary period until Westside Regional Center conducted research and found a new home for (C#1) that could provide the level of care they needed. LPA asked (W#2) if the home abandoned (C#1), (W#2) stated that “that’s not the case.
LPA was not able to interview (C#1) and other clients due to clients are not verbal and they are severely disable. However, Westside Regional Center is the responsible party for (C#1) and 3 more clients at the facility. LPA did spoke with WSRC.
During this investigation, LPA found did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegation(s).
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation(s) are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8).
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Edgar Arana/Administrator.
|