1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Facility staff did not allow client to make a phone call. Staff interviews revealed that staff do not prohibit any clients from using the telephone. Staff interviews revealed (3) out of the (4) clients own their own cell phone and at times they use the facility phone. Staff interviews also revealed that C-2 and C-3 call their family member (s) on a daily basis. Staff interviewed indicated they also assist Clients in dialing the phone numbers for them. Interviewed Staff indicated they have not received any reports nor have observed any staff not allowing clients the use of the telephone. Interviewed staff also indicated they are trained in Mandating Reporting, Client Rights and CPI . (1) out of (4) interviewed clients indicated staff do not allow clients to use the phone. However, the (1) client alleging this was unable to provide further details such as dates and time frames. (3) out of (4) clients indicated staff allow clients to use the telephone when requested. Staff and client interviews do not corroborate this allegation.
Allegation: Facility staff handled client in a rough manner. Staff interviews revealed that staff do not handle clients in a rough manner (including grabbing arms, twisting them and hitting clients’ heads). Interviewed Staff indicated they have not received any reports nor have observed any staff handling clients in a rough manner. Interviewed staff also indicated they are trained in Mandating Reporting, Client Rights and CPI. (1) out of (4) interviewed clients indicated staff handle clients in a rough manner. However, the (1) client alleging this was unable to provide further details such as dates and time frames. (3) out of (4) clients interviewed indicated that staff do not handle clients in a rough manner. Interviewed clients have not witnessed staff handling clients in a rough manner. Staff and client interviews do not corroborate this allegation.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A telephonic exit interview was conducted with the Facility Administrator, a hard copy was provided via email for signature and Appeal Rights were also provided. |