1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This report serves as an amendment and supersedes the original complaint investigation report created on 03/16/23. The findings of the allegations remained as unsubstantiated. ***
LPA obtained copies of the staff and client rosters, client#1’s files and documents with relevant information.
In regard of allegation, “staff are retaliating against resident for filing a complaint,” it was alleged that client#1 was being harassed for filing complaints.
The investigation revealed the following: Per client interview of client#1 (C1), C1 stated client was harassed by other clients for filing complaints, not harassed by staff. Five (5) out of six (6) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. All five (5) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed facility had a policy to ensure clients had right to file complaints. Per file reviews, staff had annual in-service training on clients’ right. Therefore, there is not preponderance evidence to prove the facility retaliating against client for filing a complaint.
In regard of allegation, “staff refuse to provide resident with his records,” it was alleged that client#1 requested to review client#1’s files/chart and staff had not provided the chart to client for review.
The investigation revealed the following: Per client interview of client#1 (C1), client stated staff had not provide C1’s records to C1’s review since requested. Five (5) out of six (6) clients interviewed stated they could review their files if they requested. All five (5) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed facility would provide client’s file for clients review if requested. Staff stated C1 said client did not want to see client’s record after requested for file review. Therefore, staff did not refuse to provide client with client’s records for review.
In regard of allegation, “staff are mentally abusing resident,” it was alleged that client#1 felt client was being mentally abused because client asked for a transfer and client felt staff would not give client a referral ahead of time before discharged. Per client interview of client#1 (C1), client clarified that client felt being mentally abused by staff because client was not notified about the transfer progress, and it took long time to process C1’s transfer request. Five (5) out of six (6) clients interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. All five (5) staff who were interviewed denied the allegation. Staff interviews revealed staff had notified client of the transfer progress. Per file review, facility had held meetings with C1 and documented C1’s transfer progress in client’s chart/notes. Since client’s placement needs to go through the court and different State departments, the process takes time. Thus, there is not preponderance evidence to prove the facility staff was mentally abusing clients. (-continued in LIC 9099C-) |