1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per the client interviews, all six (6) out of six (6) clients interviewed stated that staff did not coerce clients taking over their SSIs. They all indicated they felt safe residing at the facility. Per staff interviews, all four (4) out of four (4) staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegation which indicated staff did not coerce any conservators or clients to relinquish their social security funds (SSI). Staff communicated with the conservator regarding returning the full monthly PNIs to the conserved client. Staff stated that there was a possibility of financial abuse on a conserved client since the client’s conservator did not give the full amount of PNI to client since May 2025 to present. Since all staff were mandated reporters, staff needed to bring it up when possible financial abuse was observed and became a concern. Per record review, the alleged victim client is conserved personally, not financially / estate. As indicated in the client’s PNI balances, the conservator gave the client a total amount of $500 PNI from May 2025 to Dec 2025, which the client should have received $179 x 8 months = $1,432. Therefore, staff’s concern was reasonable which did not show staff had coerced client’s conservator to relinquish social security funds.
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, interviews with staff, residents, review of resident files and LPA's observation, the investigation did not reveal any evidence to support the allegations mentioned above.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Program Director, Elizabeth Welch. The findings were discussed and a copy of this report was provided. |