1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.
It is alleged that C1 has both food and personal belongings (a cup) that have been used and consumed by others, and staff did not ensure that their belongings were properly safeguarded. Interview with S1 revealed that C1 had used a cup to drink out of, placed it in the sink, and later another client used it, this made C1 upset and is believed to be the reason for this allegation. LPA interviewed 4 staff and 4 out of 4 staff denied the above allegation and stated that the cups at the facility are intended for all clients to be able to use and are not reserved for one particular client, additionally staff stated they were unaware that C1 had a personal cup. Staff stated that if a client is to bring outside food the food will be placed in a plastic bag with clients name and date, and placed in the refrigerator. The 4 staff stated that they have not given clients food to other clients. LPA attempted interviews with clients, due to cognitive disabilities LPA was only able to conduct 2 successful client interviews, in which both clients denied the above allegation and stated that they believe their personal belongings are kept safe. LPA interviewed C1’s regional center service coordinator and they stated that C1 has not mentioned any of these claims to them in the conversations they have had.
Allegation: Staff are not properly addressing altercations between residents.
It is alleged that C1 has been spit on and disrespected by other clients and staff did nothing to prevent or address these altercations. Interview with S1 revealed that C1 is more independent than the other clients and recalls a time when one client did speak loudly towards C1, however, it was explained to C1 that the client has an intellectual disability and its their way of communicating, this was the only altercation that S1 was able to recall and is believed to be the reason for this allegation. LPA interviewed 4 staff and 4 out of 4 staff denied the above allegation and stated that there have not been any altercations between clients at the facility due to their cognitive disabilities. LPA attempted interviews with clients, due to cognitive disabilities LPA was only able to conduct 2 successful client interviews, in which both clients denied the above allegation and stated that they have never been in any altercations with any of their peers or staff. LPA interviewed C1’s regional center service coordinator and they stated that C1 has not mentioned any of these claims to them in the conversations they have had.
Based on statements and interviews conducted, review of C1’s files and medication review, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided. |