1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Department conducted an assessment between 11:45 and 12:45 pm and observed how meals were prepared and how meals were served. The Department noticed several hot food tray warmers, and food
was carried out within two to three minutes at tables by (5) servers. The meals are “made to order" customized to specifications from the standard daily menu, weekly menu, or alternative menu.
Interviews conducted with staff # 1 and #3 between 10 am and 11:20 am stated that residents have choices aside from what is on the daily/weekly menu and will be made upon request daily. In addition, residents have the right to refuse if they are not satisfied with the temperature; the dish will then be reheated/refrigerated or a new dish will be created. (S1-and S3) stated there is always an option for residents to refuse their meals and replace their meals to their liking if unsatisfied with what is being served. (According to S3), a resident may get preoccupied with socializing while their meals are being served, causing the food to cool for a few minutes.
On 11/30/23, interviews between 11:30 and 12:45 pm (9) out of (9) residents #1-#9 (R1-R9) verified that they were aware of meal options and are aware that they do have the right to refuse meals served are substandard or not served in the proper temperature. (R1-R1) were complimentary of the food and service and had no issues with meals provided by the facility. The facility has a suggestion box available adjacent to the front office and dining room area to garner opinions or suggestions from residents, staff, or visitors. Based on information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support allegation.
Based on information gathered, through an inspection of the facility, observation, analysis records of service records, interviews, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations: "Licensee does not ensure faucets for personal care deliver adequate water for residents" and "Staff do not provide adequate food service to residents".
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Zoila Marroquin, and a copy of this report is provided. |