1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the Allegation: Staff abandoned resident at the hospital.
This complaint alleged that the facility did not pick R1 up from the hospital. Records review indicate the following: The Needs and Service plan and the Physician Report all indicate that R1 had cognitive issues. The Admission Agreement indicates on page 7-part G “Memory Care” was scratched off and no charges were found for memory care services. The 30-day notice to terminate was mailed to R1 and R1 family on 10/07/2024. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that R1 had cognitive issues which the facility could no longer take care of R1 care needs. S1 indicates that the facility served R1 and R1 families with a 30-day notice to terminate. S1 indicates that S1 spoke to the hospital on 08/12/2025 and was given notice that the hospital moved R1 to a new facility and R1 wife was aware of R1 being moved. 3 out of 3 staff deny the allegation. R1 is no longer in the facility and cannot be interviewed. 8 out of 9 residents deny the allegation.
Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff abandoned resident at the hospital” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited during today's visit.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Administrator William Boles (S1). |