1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | This report serves as an amendment to clarify the findings. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected in the report created on 3/6/2024.
During interviews with residents (R#1-R#4), (4) out of (4) stated that they are aware of their rights, and (4) out of (4) stated that they feel facility staff respect their rights. In addition, (3) out of (4) state that no facility staff has ever not respected their private conversations. When LPA Cross interviewed (R#2), LPA observed (R#2) watching TV and eating breakfast; LPA Cross noticed (R#2) needed to be more engaging in the questions LPA was asking them. Moreover, (4) out of (4) residents stated that when the Long-term Care Ombudsman comes to the facility to see them, they have private conversation with them, and the facility administrator is not present during these conversations. Also (4) out of (4) stated that when they received telephone calls or visits from friends and family members, the facility administrator gives them privacy.
During a phone interview with witnesses (W#1-W#4), (4) out of (4) stated that the facility values and respects residents' privacy. Visitors can enjoy the peace of mind that they can confidently talk to their loved ones without any interference from the administrator.
During this investigation, LPAs did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegation(s).
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation(s) are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Robert Smith /Administrator. |