1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Illegal eviction. It’s being alleged the facility is trying to evict a resident for the last two months. “Last week the facility gave a 30-day eviction notice requesting resident to leave the facility by 05/01/2022.”
The investigation revealed the following: 2 of 2 denied the allegation, citing that the eviction is not illegal due to non- payment and the notification sent to Department of Social Services (DSS). S1 states, “yes, R1 hasn’t paid for 3 months, plus this month. When R1 first came here it was paid by University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). After they stopped paying, R1 didn’t pay anything.” S2 states, “our eviction letter is about nonpayment. We notified DSS, then we served with the letter. R1 has been living with us and not paying. R1 hasn’t paid in 3 months going on 4. We are helping in finding new placement. UCLA stop paying because it was just a letter of agreement (LOA), that the resident would stay for a few months while we both looked for a place for R1 to live. UCLA found R1 a place and unfortunately, they did not want to stay there.” During an interview with W1 they state, R1 doesn’t want to spend their own money, R1 rather pay for multiple storage units than to pay for their own housing.” During an interview with R1 they state, “UCLA placed me here and was paying for my housing, but I don’t know why they stopped. I don’t know who was supposed to resume paying. R1 confirms receiving benefits but states the funds are allocated to personal expenses. R1 states, they generally do not have money to pay the facility. LPA was unable to interview resident R2-4 due to cognitive abilities. R5 was unavailable for interview.
Regarding the allegation: Staff failed to provide activities for residents in care. It’s being alleged staff do not provide any activities for the residents in care and the resident stay in their beds. The RP stated that the room doesn’t have a T.V and only has a radio. The investigation revealed the following: 2 of 2 denied the allegation. S1 states, “yes, we do but R1 doesn’t want to participate. We do coloring, shooting balls, puzzles, bingo, exercise. The current residents are limited in the things they can do. Every Sunday, R1 likes to watch movies outside here in the living room but doesn’t want to sit with the group.” S2 states, “that is incorrect. We have activities every day. R1 doesn’t want to come out of the room. Every time S1 invites R1 they don’t want to come.” R1 states, “they have no social activities here. The only interaction I have is with the caregivers asking me what I want to eat for breakfast lunch and dinner. The night caregiver and I watch 60 minutes and the Equalizer every Sunday. Other activities are not offered, and I wouldn’t participate anyway because it’s just not my thing. I read a lot and write a lot and the thing is I like people, but all these residents are bed bound and don’t really speak. I’m the only one that talks.” LPA was unable to interview resident R2-4 due to cognitive abilities. R5 was unavailable for interview. |