1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation: “Lack of supervision resulting in resident wandering away from the facility.”, it has been alleged that a staff member brought a resident down to the ground floor and left the resident unobserved which resulted in a resident leaving the facility. Record reviews show that one resident (R1) had left from the facility on 11/26/24. The facility had notified CCLD of the incident of R1's departure. In the details of the nurse's notes, R1 had departed the facility with their private caregiver (PC) and two (2) additional staff from the facility. Staff were aware of R1's departure and followed the resident (R1) and PC. This resident (R1) was located and were transported back to the facility, without any changes of conditions noted. Interviews have revealed that all nine (9) residents and all six (6) staff have denied the allegation has taken place. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation “Staff not administering resident’s medication as prescribed.”, it has been alleged a resident was not administered half of their medication for 5 days. Record reviews have revealed that R1 was in transition between the initial lease agreement, which was conducted on 09/29/23, and R1's actual date of admission on 11/22/23. The facility was not in possession of the medications in question, yet placed an order for the medications in question on 11/22/23. Interviews revealed that all nine (9) residents and all six (6) staff have denied the allegation has taken place. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation “Staff did not provide medical attention to resident.”, it has been alleged that staff members did not provide medical attention to resident’s chronic condition which led to an infection. Record reviews have indicated that the community nurse, staff two (S2), had arrived to R1's room after the report of R1's cough, received on 07/30/24. R1's PC then informed S2 that the "as-needed" medication had already been provided. According to the facilities' medication management plan, "Residents receiving medication management services at the community, other than dementia Neighborhood residents, are expected to receive their medication at the wellness center or other designated area." which is against the facilities standard of practice. Interviews have revealed that all nine (9) residents and all six (6) staff have denied the allegation has taken place. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report continues, see LIC-9099C. |