1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation 1 – Staff disconnected resident’s telephone. Interview conducted with Director of Care Services, communicated that R#1 family member is upset that they are not R#1 POA. They are just trying to create problems for the facility. R#1 has their own phone in their room. The phone line has never been disconnected. The pals would have advised management if the phone line had gone dead. Interviews with S#2 – S#7, they communicated that R#1 phone has never been disconnected as far as they know. If the phone line would have been disconnected the private pal or R#1 would have told management about it. R#1 uses the phone to call R#1 friends all the time, R#1 would have noticed if R#1’s phone line would have been disconnected. R#2 – R#11, communicated that they have their own cell phone, so they would know if the facilities phone has ever been disconnected. LPA observed that R#1 has their own line land, and it had a dial tone when LPA picked it up to see if land line was working. The observations and interviews did not concur with the above allegation.
Allegation 2 - Staff over medicated resident. Interviews conducted with Director of Care Services, RN, and S#3 - LVN, communicated that R#1 has always received their medication on time. They have never missed a dose or overmedicated R#1. R#1 receives their medication as indicated by doctor’s orders. They have never over medicated R#1 or any other resident. Interviews with R#1 – R#11, communicated that their medication has always been given right and never been overmedicated. LPA reviewed Mars (August and September,) the medication has given and prescribed by doctor, the staff indicated on every entry for everyday medication morning, afternoon, evening and at bedtime medication had been given. The records reviews and interviews conducted did not concur with the above allegation.
Allegation 3 - Staff restricting visitation to resident. Interview conducted with Director of Care Services, communicated that R#1 family member came once to visit R#1 and has never come back to visit R#1. The one-time the family member came over to visit, family member was complaining about everything. Family member was just mad about not being the POA anymore. Interviews with S#2 – S#7, they communicated that R#1 always has a specific visitor that comes all the time to visit R#1, R#1 enjoys their company. Family member only came once and R#1 doesn’t like to see family member. Interview with R#1 communicated that R#1 doesn’t have anything to do with family member. R#1 doesn’t like family member and never had a relationship with family member. R#1 doesn’t know why family member calls R#1 and R#1 hasn’t seen family member in years and likes it like that. R#2 – R#11, communicated that they are always allowed to have visitor’s, facility never restricts their visitors. Interviews conducted did not concur with the above allegation.
|