1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff did not respond to a resident's alert button in a timely manner or at all. It is alleged that Memory Care staff have a slow response or no response to call button calls made during evening/nighttime hours. It was reported that resident (R1) has pushed the pendant for assistance and has waited for 2 hours and other times no staff respond to the call. A total of 6 staff were interviewed, of which five (5) staff confirmed that the facility has had issues with the pagers signal and resetting. According to staff, there have been problems with the pagers for at least six months. In the last 1-2 weeks there have been more issues with the pagers because the resetting feature is not working, or the residents click the pendant and the pager does not receive the signal. Resident (R1) stated that in the last week there have been numerous times the pendant button was pressed and there was no response at all. Two (2) family members were interviewed and they stated there have been issues with staff response times after calls for assistance. Maintenance Director stated that the pendant is supposed to be pushed three times in order for a signal to be received in the pager, and that some residents do not operate the pendant properly. However, per review of the Instructions for Use of the pendant it does not state that. LPA tested pendants and room pull-string buttons in Memory Care rooms, and staff did not receive the signal on their pagers. It was discovered that some of the staff pagers used in the Memory Care unit are faulty because a signal is not received on the pager. Later in the day, Executive Director, Maintenance Director, and LPA tested the signal system, pendant system, and pull string and it was determined that the problem is the pager system. There is sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Based on observation and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Kimberly Sanchez. A copy of the report and appeal rights were issued.
|