1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation that "Staff hit resident resulting in injuries," it is alleged that C1 was hit by a staff member who works at the facility which caused them to sustain extreme bruising on chest and right armpit. During interviews with the clients, zero (0) out of four (4) interviewed corroborated the allegation that C1 was hit by any staff member at the facility. During an interview with C1, they claimed that they fell at the facility which caused their injury. Other clients interviewed stated that they have never seen any staff member hit anyone in the facility. During interviews with the staff, zero (0) out of four (4) corroborated the allegation that any staff member hit C1 in the facility. During the course of the investigation, it was revealed through interviews with S1 and W1 that the injury was the result of an interaction between C1 and S4. Furthermore, it was also revealed through hospital discharge paperwork and documentation from C1's orthopedic specialist that C1 suffered a broken right clavicle as a result of this altercation. During an interview with S4, on the date of the incident they went to C1's room and upon greeting C1, they can observe that C1 was upset. S4 stated that C1 ultimately lunged at them in an attempt to push and hit S4, and S4 stated that they extended their arms outwards in order to create distance between them. S4 stated that C1 lunged into their outstretched arms so forcefully that this caused C1 to fall backwards and onto a night stand drawer in their room. S4 stated that C1 falling onto their drawer ultimately caused the injury, and that they did not intentionally hit or push C1 to cause the injury.
LPA determined based on the evidence that this injury was not the result of staff intentionally hitting C1, and therefore the allegation will be unsubstantiated. However due to the Serious Bodily Injury that C1 sustained along with the fact that Emergency intervention procedures outlines in the Facility Behaviorist Report plan for C1 were not followed during this incident, a separate citation will be issued on a case management in relation to this complaint investigation.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, clients, review of client files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided. |