1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following. Regarding Allegation: Staff did not prevent client from accessing illegal drugs- It is alleged that staff did not prevent C1 from accessing illegal drugs. On 09/23/24, C1 was taken to urgent care with symptoms of a runny nose and slight cough. After examination and labs ordered by the hospital, it was revealed C1 tested positive for PCP (Phenyl cyclohexyl piperidine) and amphetamines. C1 was treated for symptoms and released back to the facility on 09/23/24. C1 is ambulatory, non-verbal, has a severe vision impairment and has cognitive impairments. C1 has a physician’s order for chlorpromazine and clonazepam. Physician’s order dated 09/24/24, revealed C1’s recent positive testing (09/23/24) for PCP and amphetamines, was due to C1’s prescription of chlorpromazine and clonazepam. During health & safety check on 09/26/24, LPA Ramirez observed C1 to be well groomed, dressed appropriately, and well nourished. LPA Ramirez toured facility and did not observe any immediate health & safety violations. On 09/23/24, Corporal Jacob Tillman with the Claremont Police Department, came to the facility to investigate the above allegation. Per Administrator Ana Alarcio, Corporal Tillman did not finding evidence of a crime and left a citizen contact card as reference. LPA Ramirez contacted Corporal Tillman and left a message requesting a callback. Three (3) out of the three (3) staff interviewed deny this allegation. Two (2) out of the three (3) clients interviewed deny this allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. |