1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner for residents in care.
It is alleged that both C1 and C2 were not provided medical attention in a timely manner as C1 was observed with a healing bruise on 04/30/2026 and was not taken to ER/Urgent Care and no care plan has been put in place. It was recommended that C2 received a urinalysis on 3/25/26, and C1 has not received one, on 4/29/26 it was observed that C1 had possible blood in urine (catheter) was taken to the hospital per recommendations from Regional Center representative and it was observed on 5/4/26 when C1 had gone to the hospital that they had a UTI. LPA obtained documents within C1’s file and per the Nursing Notes on 4/30/26 the facility was contacted by C1’s Day Program that bruising was observed on clients foot. The RN assessment dated 4/30/26 that was completed by the facility Registered Nurse did not indicate that there were any skin observations, the note on the skin section of the assessment stated: No skin issues noticed, documentation of bruising began being noted on the assessments beginning 5/2/26. A temporary care Plan for C1 was placed on 5/1/26 to monitor the bruising and swelling. During LPAs visit on 5/11/26 both S1 and S2 stated that C1 has not gone to the hospital to rule out any sign of fracture or advancing injury and they stated that they did not think it was necessary due to C1 stating they are not in pain. C1 is non-ambulatory and requires use of a wheelchair, along with assistance with ADL’s and transfers. Interview with W1 confirmed that on 4/30/26 C1 was observed at day program with bruising and swelling to left foot and facility was notified of the observation. Interview with W2 revealed that when bruising and swelling is observed clients are to be sent to urgent care, hospital or visit primary care physician to ensure that there is no fracture or advance injury present, as clients at ARFPSHN’s (adult residential facility for persons with special health care needs) do not feel pain the way other individuals may. LPA obtained documents within C2’s file and per the Restricted Health Care dated 4/7/26 plan that was provided C2 has a history of UTI, last UTI 2/23/26 – medication was prescribed for 7 days. No follow up visit to ensure that UTI was cleared was provided. During file review LPA discovered C2’s most recent hospitalization (or doctor) is dated 5/4/26, per hospital discharge paperwork C2 tested positive for UTI on 5/4/26 and was prescribed with new medications. Interview with S1 confirmed that C2 has not been taken for a follow up appointment to ensure C2’s UTI is completely gone.
Civil penalty of $250 is being issued for a repeated violation -80075(a)- within same calander year.
Based on LPAs observations, interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were emailed to anahi.murillo_serrano@rescare.com and pua.tata@rescare.com. |