1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Covid-19 reporting protocols are not being followed. It’s being alleged that the facility is not reporting active covid cases to the proper agencies or cleaning and sanitizing appropriately to prevent the spread of illness. The investigation revealed the following: During interviews with staff, 3 of the 3 denied the allegation to be true. S1 states, the active covid cases were reported via an incident report to Community Care Licensing (CCL) and to South-Central Los Angeles Regional Center (SCLARC). S1 also states, The Department of Public Health was contacted and informed that they do not meet the criteria of being an outbreak facility. S1 states facility staff are to clean every two hours and that’s what’s mention in their mitigation plan. S2 confirmed being informed by management about the positive Covid case. “I read it in an email.” S3 states, I was notified by the Administrator via a phone call. Both S2 and S3 state they were trained to clean and disinfect the facility after each use or every two hours, whichever comes first.
During interviews with the witnesses, 2 out of 2 denied the allegation to be true. W1 confirmed receiving a call from the Administrator. “I received a call from the Administrator and then a report followed a couple days later.” W2 states, the supervisor informed me about my relatives’ exposure and then their negative test results.” LPA attempted to interview all clients but was unable to due to communication barriers. During a record review, LPA Agard confirmed receiving an email on January 3rd, 2022 at 6:41pm from Administrator, Linda Hudson stating the facility had a positive Covid case and an incident report would follow. An Incident report was received, and LPA Agard began tracking the facility’s positive covid cases on January 4th, 2022. During a review of mitigation plan, it states the facility has plans for infection control which includes routine and frequent cleaning and disinfection of rooms and common areas to be completed by staff.
Based on interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given. |