1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regard to the allegations that “Staff mismanaged client's medication,” It is alleged that medication logs are altered to hide missed medications. During interviews with staff none of the staff corroborated the allegation. Three (3) out three (3) staff interviewed stated there has never been any issues with medications and they all are trained a use the MAR log. LPA reviewed medication that is centrally stored and locked in cabinet and found no discrepancies.
In regard to the allegations that “Staff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to clients in care,” It is alleged that,” facility staff sometimes work double shifts and sleep at the facility. During interviews with staff none of the staff corroborated the allegation. S2 stated they hired three new staff and if any doubles are done its by choice for overtime. Staff interviewed over the phone stated there is always enough staff and there is night staff but are working not sleeping. C3 has limited speech and would not have knowledge about staffing.
In regard to the allegations that” Staff do not ensure toilet paper is readably accessible to clients in care,” It is alleged that administrator locks away the toilet paper and is not accessible to staff or clients. During interviews with staff and clients none of the interviews corroborated the allegation. S1 stated there is always toilet paper and if anything is running out, they just ask, and S1 will go purchase the item. S2 stated that no toilet paper is left in bathroom #2 because C1 will flush or eat the paper instead it is left in cabinet in hallway. C3 stated that there is always toilet paper. LPA toured facility and observed adequate supply of toilet paper in hallway cabinet, bathroom #1, and garage. LPA also reviewed C1’s IPP report and it indicated C1 has a behavior where C1 eats uneatable objects.
Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
|