1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews show that R1 is only provided what is prescribed and nothing more or nothing less unless they refuse medications. There was no documentation of medication errors for R1 or of staff noting issues with R1 due to medication for the month of August. LPA reviewed notes from staff stating that R1 requested an extra dosage of abilify on 5/26/23 but was refused due to them already receiving the required amount by physicians orders. Interviews do not show that R1 was overmedicated. Based on interviews, files reviewed and observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In regards to the allegation "Staff do not ensure a comfortable living environment for resident" it was alleged that S1 and S2 raise the volume of the music in the dining room to make R1 uncomfortable and have auditory hallucinations. (5) of (5) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews with residents and staff does not show that staff are purposely making residents uncomfortable in the facility. Staff interviewed denied turning up the volume in the dining room to make R1 uncomfortable. (5) of (6) residents stated they have never seen staff attempt to make R1 uncomfortable to they may leave and go to their room. Based on interviews, files reviewed and observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
In regards to the allegation "Staff violated residents personal rights" it was alleged that staff of the facility conducted body checks on residents on 8/14/23 and inappropriately touched R1. (5) of (5) Staff interviewed denied the allegation. (5) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews state that the staff the facility attempted to conduct skin checks on all residents of the facility on 8/14/23 for rashes due to possible exposure to scabies. Interviews with staff and residents state that it was not forced and it was voluntary. Interviews do not show that staff inappropriately touched residents who participated and no one had an issue with being asked as they understood the reason for the check. Interviews also show that R1 agreed to the body check but after the fact, got upset that the staff were doing that to residents. LPA reviewed documentation of roster from 8/14/23 listing residents who were checked and there were names of residents who refused. This shows residents were not forced to let staff conduct skin checks. Interviews with (5) of (6) residents stated that staff did not put hands on them or violated their personal rights. S1 and S3 were present during R1's skin check and they denied touching R1 inappropriately. Based on interviews, files reviewed and observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit Interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided. |