1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings. It was alleged that R2 stole R1's personal belongings, personal documents and attempted to add an additional cable TV receiver in R2's room.
Interviewed Supervisor and S1 mentioned that they were aware of the incident that happened about 2 months ago, R2 stole R1's personal documents. R1 and R2 were roommates before the incident. Interviewed Supervisor stated that the best option for both residents was to move R2 to another room to avoid further issues. They chose the better option at that time. Supervisor and S1 stated that they didn't hear any complaints from staff or residents that any resident stole another resident personal belongings, personal documents before. This incident was first one that they heard, and they have done and will do everything to avoid such cases in the future. Interviewed S2 and S3 stated that they didn't hear any complaints about stealing of residents personal belongings. Interviewed S4 stated that they heard that R2 tried to use R1's documents / information to get extra Spectrum box in R2's room. Interviewed R1 stated that R2 was R1's roommate before. R1 indicated that R2 is nice person but he/she likes to go thought to R1's personal belongings. Facility staff move R2 from R1's room. Interviewed R2 - R6 stated that they are not missing anything, and no one took / stole their personal belongings or personal information. They didn't hear that any resident stole another resident personal belonging, personal information.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided.
|