1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Resident sustained unknown bruises due to staff neglect or physical abuse. It is alleged that dime sized marks were reportedly seen on C1’s chest on 5/07/2026, and similar bruising was reportedly found on C1’s back on 5/19/2026, both incidents were reported to the director of the day program. All staff interviewed denied the allegation, stating that they would never hit or hurt any client. Staff indicated that the program has a hands off policy and all staff completed training in Mandt, zero tolerance policy and personal rights. (3) of (4) clients interviewed stated that they have not been hit or handled aggressively by any of the staff and they feel safe in the program. All clients interviewed indicated that staff are well trained, helpful and nice to them. Interview with C1 was unsuccessful due to his cognitive abilities and LPA did not observe any visible injuries or bruises on C1. Interview with FM revealed that on 05/21/2026, they figured out that the bruises/marking found on C1's body was caused by the park bench and not due to staff neglect or physical abuse (photos of the park bench provided). According to FM, they reported this immediately to East Los Angeles Regional Center (ELARC) and the Program Director. Documents reviewed revealed that the facility has sufficient staff and has the proper documentation and notes. Moreover, the photos of C1's bruise appeared to be consistent with the pattern and shape of the park bench with deep grooves that were the exact same size. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate with this allegation.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with family member, staff, clients, review of client files, photos and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided to Christine Grant, Quality Assurance Manager.
|