1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding Allegation #1: this investigation revealed that Resident (#1) sustained an unwitnessed fall on 06/23/20 in its bathroom. A review of the Unusual Incident/Injury Report (dated 06/23/20) documented that Staff #3 (S3: Med Tech) attended to R1’s call light. Upon arrival, S3 observed R1 on the bathroom floor and found no bruising, redness or skin tear in the affected area. R1 was able to walk without complain of pain and range of motion to bilateral extremities were intact. R1 refused to be sent to the hospital for further evaluation. A review of R1’s medical report and assessments are as follows: Pre-placement Appraisal Information, documents the resident does not require assistance with its functional capabilities. Physician’s Report, does not document that the resident is a fall risk. Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, does not document R1 has difficulties with physical development.
Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of NEGLECT/LACK OF CARE: Resident fell while in care resulting in minor injury is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding Allegation #2: this investigation revealed that a review of the facility’s Service Log (dated 06/23/20), documented that Resident #1 (R1) was monitored by Staff #4 (Caregiver – A.M.): at 6:30 a.m. for 2-hour check; at 9:00 a.m. for 2-hour check; at 11:00 a.m. for 2-hour check; at 1:00 p.m. for 2-hour check. R1 was monitored by Staff #5 (Med Tech – P.M.): at 2:30 p.m. for 2-hour check; at 5:00 p.m. for 2-hour check; at 7:00 p.m. for 2-hour check; at 9:00 p.m. for 2-hour check. R1 was monitored by Staff #6 (Med Tech – NOC): at 10:30 p.m. for 2-hour check; at 1:00 a.m. for 2-hour check; 3:00 a.m. for 2-hour check; 5:00 a.m. for 2-hour check; 6:30 a.m. for 2-hour check. A review of the Unusual Incident/Injury Report (dated 06/23/20) documented that Staff #3 (S3: Med Tech) attended to R1’s call light and assessed the resident who refused to be sent to the hospital for further evaluation.
Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of NEGLECT/LACK OF CARE: Staff did not provide assistance to resident in a timely manner is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview has been conducted and a copy of the Complaint Reports were provided to Administrator (Virgilio Ajas).
|