1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: “Licensee did not follow proper eviction procedures for resident”, it is being alleged that the facility did not follow proper eviction procedures for R1. Interviews conducted revealed the following: According to S1 the facility did follow proper eviction procedures. According to R1 the facility did not follow proper eviction procedures, furthermore, R1 indicated that they do not read or understand the English language, additionally, R1 indicated that they received their Eviction Notice in English and not in their native language. R1’s records reviewed revealed the following: the New Resident Alert states R1 “only speaks Spanish.” The Thirty Day Notice to Quit dated 05/07/2025 indicates that R1 did not follow general policies of the facility [referring to CCR87224(a)(3)] but did not describe how R1 did not follow said general policies of the facility, furthermore, the document indicates that R1 is not an appropriate fit for the facility [referring to CCR87224(a)(4)] but does conducted/provide a reappraisal of R1 as stated in regulation CCR87224(a)(4) and explain how R1 is not an appropriate fit for the facility. Emails, faxes, and mail reviewed from the facility to the department did not demonstrate that the facility provided a written report of an eviction within 5 days to R1. Substantiated: Based on interviews and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted, plans of corrections were reviewed and developed. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and left with the Assistant Administrator, Jennifer Rivas. |