1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation : Staff do not assist resident with arranging transportation
It was alleged that staff do not assist a resident with scheduling their ACCESS transportation services, resulting in the resident being unable to attend church services.
On 01/07/2026 between the hours of 9:38am -10:01am, LPA interviewed the Administrator in regard to the allegation. A1 denied the allegation and stated that the facility assists residents with scheduling ACCESS transportation upon request. A1 stated that some residents schedule their own transportation. A1 reported that transportation issues involving R10 occurred due to scheduling errors and missed phone calls, not staff inaction. A1 stated that if ACCESS cancels transportation, staff notify the resident and offer to reschedule.
On 12/29/2025 between the hours of 9:43am -4:00pm, the LPA interviewed 10 staff regarding the allegation.
8 of 10 staff denied the allegation and stated resident or the resident's family will arrange their own transportation but the front desk will assist with arranging transportation for the residents upon request.
2 of 10 staff were unaware of the allegation. 2 of the 2 staff stated not having any knowledge of residents transportation being delayed and or canceled.
On 12/29/2025, between the hours of 11:24am - 2:26pm, the LPA interviewed 10 residents regarding the allegation.
8 of 10 residents denied the allegation and states making arrangements for transportation themselves.
2 of 10 residents did not confirm nor deny the allegation. 1 of 2 residents stated not knowing how to setting up rides or transportation but would like to someone who would help them get more information on how to do so in regards to this matter. While the other 1 of 2 resident stated this allegation does not apply at all due to them never trying to go somewhere.
On 01/07/2026 , between the hours of 9:20am - 9:25am, LPA conducted a records review and observed the following: LPA did not observe any reports and or notes in regards to this allegation.
Based on information gathered through interviews and record reviews, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies were cited for the allegations above.
An exit interview was conducted with Catherine Dacara (Assistant Administrator) & a copy of this report is provided.
|