1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: "Staff did not prevent resident from engaging in physical altercation with another resident." On 5/31/2022, client (C1) was hit in the face by client (C2) while waiting in line to receive Personal & Incidental funds. Video surveillance was reviewed during today's visit. The alleged incident occurred at 10:57 AM outside the staff office where staff (S1 & S2) were at. It took staff (S2) 22 seconds to respond and address the verbal altercation that resulted in the physical incident between C1 & C2. Based on video staff should have attended to the verbal altercation between the clients, in order to prevent the physical incident. Based on interviews conducted and file review client (C2) has history of hitting clients and aggression. Client (C2) has hit a total of four (4) clients in the last several months. The most recent incident reported was yesterday. Client (C2) shoved client (C3) in the dining room. Client (C3) hit it's head on the wall. Therefore, staff shall provide care and supervision necessary if it is known that client(s) engage in verbal and/or physical altercations while they are in the same area. A total of 12 clients were interviewed, of which four (4) stated staff do not prevent physical altercations between residents. All staff denied this allegation. However, video surveillance confirmed the incident could have been prevented if staff had responded sooner.
Allegation: "Resident sustained injury while in care." Based on interviews conducted and review of video surveillance review the findings indicate that on 5/31/2022 client (C1 & C2) had a verbal altercation outside the staff office. Video surveillance showed client (C2) approached client (C1) threatened to punch the resident, and 2 seconds later punched client (C1) in the face. Client (C2) punched C1 with force, and continued to threaten C1 after staff responded to the incident. There were two other residents present during the incident. Staff checked C1 for injuries, and at the time no visible injuries were observed. However, C1 developed blue/black bruising on the left side of the cheek. During today's visit, LPAs observed the cheek had marks of a faded bruise. Five (5) out 12 clients interviewed confirmed C1 was hit by C2. Client (C2) acknowledged punching C1 in the face. Client (C2) stated "they get me mad they deserve to be hit." Staff interviews confirmed the incident resulted in injury.
Based on interviews conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiency is cited. See LIC 9099D.
Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Ruby Garcia. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. |