1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: "Staff did not prevent resident from engaging in inappropriate behaviors." It is alleged that client (C4) and C13 walk around the facility with their pants low/sagging, which makes some residents feel uncomfortable and/or harassed. Per interviews conducted, staff have been informed of these behaviors, but staff have not addressed clients in question regarding inappropriate dressing. One client reported that C13 purposely walks around with the pants zipper down, and with it's private anatomical part exposed. This alleged incident occurred during the nighttime/evening hours. It is alleged that C4's pants are very low, and makes C1 feel sexually harassed. Client (C4) denied intentional behavior towards C1, and stated it wears it's pant low because of style and most recently it's belt has not fit properly. Client (C13) was not at the facility at the time of the visit, and was not interviewed. All staff stated they have not seen C4 or C13 expose themselves to anyone, nor do they wear their pants offensively low. Eight (8) of of 12 clients denied this allegation. During today's interview, LPAs observed C4 was wearing it's short slightly low, partially showing it's underwear, but not exposing any skin.
Allegation: "Staff made inappropriate comment towards resident." It is alleged that staff (S1)/Administrator told client (C1) to keep it's mouth shut. According to client (C1) Administrator told C1 to leave C2 alone, instead of addressing that C2 punched C1 in the face. Administrator stated that C1 does not respond well to disciplinary direction, and all staff try to accommodate the client with it's needs. Ten (10) out of 12 clients denied this allegation. The majority of clients interviewed stated Administrator is professional and does not make inappropriate comments to them. All staff interviewed denied this allegation. There is insufficient supportive evidence to prove this allegation.
Although the allegation(s) may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Ruby Garcia. A copy of the report was issued. |