1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding Allegation #3: this investigation revealed the facility has seven (7) self-locking exits; however, clients in care will leave the east side gate ajar (with a rock) to regain entrance; but, it also invites passer bys to gain entrance onto the facility grounds; and, passer bys have entered the main building of the facility to use the common bathrooms. The facility has a contracted security company that monitors the exits after hours; however, interviews conducted corroborated passer bys will enter (via the east side gate) after visiting hours instead of using the front main door (with intercom system) to gain entrance. During a physical tour of the facility grounds, LPA/RA Ceniceros' observed the east side gate ajar (photograph).
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation of NEGLECT/LACK OF CARE: Staff are not assuring a residents safety is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiency was observed and citation issued (ref. LIC 9099D).
An exit interview has been conducted and a copy of the Complaint Report and Appeal Rights were provided to Administrator (Ruby Garcia)
|