1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
In regards to the allegation: “Staff are prohibiting resident from having visitors indoors.” It is alleged that a resident is not allowed to have visitors inside the facility. Interviews conducted with the staff denied the allegation and stated that they are aware of resident rights regarding visitation. Staff interviewed stated that facility allows indoor visits however, visitors are required to go through covid screening and wear a mask upon entering to protect the residents in the facility. Staff interviewed indicated that they did not restrict visitors of any residents nor require an appointment to visit. (4) of (4) staff interviewed indicated that R1’s family members refused to be screened nor follow the facility's visitation policy. Staff stated they still allowed R1's family members to come in and just asked them to follow covid guidelines. S1 stated that the visiting requirements were explained to R1. (9) out of (10) residents interviewed stated that they are allowed to have visitors indoors during visiting hours and the facility does not restrict their visitation rights. Residents indicated that the staff conducted covid screening, signing in and checking temperatures before letting visitors in. LPA observed the visiting policy posted on the door and is accessible to residents and families. LPA did not observe any documents or evidence in R1's file indicating that the facility is restricting visitation from certain individuals or family members. LPA reviewed documents such as facility's best practices for visitation and CCLD Provider Information Notice (PIN 22-28.1-ASC), issued on Nov 29, 2022 regarding best practices for visitation. Documents reviewed stated that licensees should follow the strictest requirements, encourage shorter indoor visits and longer outdoor visits and recommended screening for COVID-19 signs, symptoms, and exposure for visitors. Additionally, a well-fitting face mask was required for visitors at all times in indoor settings, regardless of vaccination status. Based on statements and interviews conducted with residents and staff as well as reviewed files and documentation, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview and a copy of this report was provided to Rosalie Sandoval, Administrator. |