1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
On 6/24/2020 LPA toured facility. LPA was shown four client rooms and attached bathrooms. No leaks were noted from toilet by LPA or maintenance.
On 7/2/2020 LPA reviewed facility work orders and plumbers’ bills. Both the plumbers bills and work orders show that issues like clogged toilets, water damage, or fixing of doors are handled in a timely manner.
On 6/25/2020 and 6/30/2020 LPA Cifuentes interviewed residents 1-8. Of the resident’s interviewed, 1 did not reply, but 7 out of 7 stated their toilets were not leaking and that they had not needed maintenance on their rooms.
On 6/25/2020 and 6/20/2020 LPA Cifuentes interviewed facility staff. Out of 7 staff asked, two did not know anything about facilities toilets, out of the 5 remaining, 5 out of 5 staff stated that clients toilets were not leaking.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation: Sewage is leaking into the dry food storage in the kitchen
The investigation revealed the following:
On 6/24/2020 LPA Cifuentes was given a tour of facility. Tour began in kitchen, where LPA was shown dry storage room. Due to using video chat, LPA was not able to see a leak in celling, but per staff member giving tour, it did in fact have a leak and there were buckets to catch the runoff. Ceiling appeared to be intact, not buckling or appearing to cave in. Continued on LIC 9099-C
|