1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Staff are not meeting residents needs due to lack of staffing.
The investigation revealed the following:
On 5/6/2020 LPA toured facility. LPA saw dining room, activity room, kitchen and a few resident bedrooms.
On 5/22/2020 and 5/26/2020 LPA reviewed facility records. Staffing schedule provided to LPA show that in general two caregivers are assigned to assisted living and two are assigned to memory care. On March 2, 2020, facility had one caregiver assigned to memory care and one caregiver assigned to assisted living during the AM shift. On April 21, 2020 there was only one caregiver assigned to assisted living and again the same on April 27, 2020. On April 26 there was one caregiver assigned to memory care.
On 5/21 and 5/22/2020 LPA interviewed residents 1-8. Of the resident’s interviewed 5 out 0 8 stated they believed their need were being met. 4 out of 8 residents stated they did not believe facility had enough staff.
On 5/20/2020 and 5/22/2020 LPA Cifuentes interviewed facility staff. 5 out of 6 staff stated that they did not believe facility was sufficiently staffed and that clients needs were not being met.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division (6) and chapter (8) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
|