1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Facility has scabies. It’s being alleged a resident has the appearance of a rash that is similar to that of a person with scabies. The investigation revealed the following: During interviews with staff, 0 of 5 confirmed the allegation to be true, 5 of 5 confirmed the allegation to be false. S1- S5 all denied the allegation to be true. S1 states, “R1 had skin irritation and was being treated for that, not scabies.” S2 states, “we have never had an outbreak. R1 has never had scabies.” S3 states, “back in November, no one has reported that anyone had scabies.”
During interviews with the residents, 0 of 6 confirmed the allegation to be true, 4 of 6 confirmed the allegation to be false and 2 were unable to interview. R1 was unable to interview due to cognitive impairment. R2-5 all denied knowing anything about the allegation or hearing anything about it. R2 states, “No, I have not heard about scabies.” R3 states, “nope, never heard that.” R6 was unable to interview.
During interviews with the witnesses, 4 of 4 denied the allegation to be true. W1 states, I investigated the resident that was accused of having scabies and it turned out that the resident did not have scabies. The reporting party does not have a medical background and therefore my supervisor had me close it out as a false positive. W2-4 all denied being aware, informed or overhearing about a resident having scabies. W2 states, “I never heard of that. R1 was being treated for a rash. It was never scabies.”
During a record review, medical records for R1 show that resident was being treated for a skin rash and not scabies. No treatment noted on R1's medication administration records for scabies.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given. |