Investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Staff do not provide activities to residents in care
It was alleged that residents are not provided activity while in care. On 4/26/23, LPA Brown conducted interviews with Administrator and staff S1-S4, staff and administrator stated residents have activities daily at the facility and have no concerns. LPA reviewed the activity schedule and staff roster that listed activity director and did not see a discrepancy. During today’s visit LPA observed residents having activities in Assisted living and Memory Care area. Based on investigation the above allegation is unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Staff does not ensure that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence
It was alleged that the facility Memory Care unit (MCU) has an overwhelming smell. On 4/26/23, Interview conducted with the Administrator stated had no complaints or concerns regarding smell in the facility. LPA Brown conducted interviews and 3 out of 4 staff stated had no concern with the smell in the facility and had any concerns. LPA reviewed the laundry and housekeeping schedule and did not see a discrepancy. During today’s visit LPA tour resident’s bedrooms and common areas and did not observe any odors while touring the facility. Based on investigation the above allegation is unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Resident grooming needs are not met
It was alleged that the resident in the facility is not well groomed. On 4/26/23, Interview conducted with the Administrator stated residents grooming needs are being met and had no complaints or concerns. LPA Brown conducted interviews with 3 out 4 staff stated residents hygiene needs are being met. 3 out of 4 staff stated they have a schedule to ensure residents hygiene needs are being met. LPA reviewed care staff schedule and observed residents in the facility to be cleaned and groomed. Based on investigation the above allegation is unsubstantiated.
Based on interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation(s) is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given. |