1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding Allegation #1: this investigation revealed based on interviews conducted by LPA Brown of facility staff, five (5) of the five (5) corroborated that they have a list of the residents that need changes; and as the changes are completed, they are marked off the list by initials. No one has missed changes but there are times that a resident(s) will refuse and ask staff to come back later, but no resident has complained about being left soiled while in care. LPA Brown interviewed residents (R1-R6) regarding the allegation and six (6) out of six (6) corroborated that staff did not leave them soiled while in care. A review of Resident #1’s "Physician’s Report" (dated 12/07/18) documented under, “Physical Health Status” that the resident does not have a bowel or bladder impairment. A review of the “Resident’s Assessment” (dated 11/08/22) documented Resident #1 is independent with toileting.
Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of PERSONAL RIGHTS: Resident was left soiled while in care is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding Allegation #2: this investigation revealed based on the "Physician’s Report" (dated 12/07/18) documented under “Medication Management” (dated 12/07/18) that Resident #1 can administer and store own medications. A review of Resident #1’s “Physician’s Orders” (as of 11/08/22) of prescribed medications, were administered and documented according to the resident’s medication administration records (October 2022-November 2022). A review of facility staffs medication training documented the course was received on 04/30/22. LPA interviewed facility staff, five (5) of the five (5) corroborated that they have not received a complaint from a resident(s) regarding their physician's orders were not being followed. LPA Brown interviewed residents (R1-R6) regarding the allegation and six (6) out of six (6) corroborated that they did not have an issue with their physician's orders or medication administration.
Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, and records reviewed, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation of PERSONAL RIGHTS: Staff did not follow physician’s orders is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview has been conducted and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to Staff #7 (S7: LVN Senad Kapetanobic, Resident Services Director).
|