1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA also interviewed R#2 - R#6. LPA obtained the following documents: Resident and Staff rosters, Copy of additional staff statements. On 07/17/23, LPA interviewed S#5 – via telephone. S#8, LPA attempted to interview staff, LPA left v/m message and S#8 never returned LPA’s call. S#9, LPA attempted to interview staff via phone, phone was disconnected.
Based on the LPA's investigation, the investigation revealed the following. Allegation – Staff assaulted resident in care. Interviews with S#1-S#4, communicated that they did not witness the incident where R#1 was allegedly assaulted by staff. They were not working during the night shift, they just heard about the incident . LPA made several attempts to interview S#6 – S#9, their phones were either turned off, no longer in service, or LPA left voice mail and staff never returned LPA’s call. S#6 – S#8, were the staff that allegedly were involved in the assault on R#1, they no longer work at the facility, including S#9. S#3 & S#4, communicated that they overheard a conversation S#9 was having over the phone. S#9 had their phone on speaker, they did not know who S#9 was speaking with, but they did know it was a staff member. The unknown staff member on the line commented something like, “You saw his face, I did that.” But they could not identify who the staff member was, but they believed it was S#7, but cannot confirm it, S#9 never mentioned the unknown staff member name. The facility does not have cameras in the facility, so there is no video evidence as to the alleged assault. Interview conducted with R#1, communicated that R#1 was dragged by staff, but did not identify who the staff members were. R#1 left 2 written notes in his room, where she states that he was assaulted and dragged by staff, but did not identify staff in the letter either. Interview conducted with R#2, communicated that they have never been assaulted or miss treated by any staff. The staff is very helpful and nice. R#3 - R#6, residents could not communicate with LPA. The interviews conducted did not concur with the above allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Jasmine Hezar, Executive Director, and a hard copy of report was provided.
|