1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation, "facility failed to safeguard resident's personal belongings while in care", on 08/27/18 R1 was receiving hospice care services. It is alleged that one of the hospice care attendants observed a ring on R1's ring finger during the bath that was given on that day. At 4pm the end of life nurse took over the shift until R1's death at 11:25pm. R1's daughter was notified via phone call of the passing at which time R1's daughter asked the end of life nurse to remove the ring off the ring finger before the coroner arrived. End of life nurse saw that there was no longer any ring on the finger, but saw indentations on the finger showing there had been a ring recently there that could have been potentially removed. The police was also alerted to the alleged theft. Based on interviews conducted with facility staff, staff interviewed denied ever seeing a ring on R1's finger while R1 was a resident of the facility. LPA attempted numerous times to interview the two hospice care attendants that were present at the facility on 08/27/18, however calls were not returned. LPA obtained a copy of R1's "Personal Property Release" form indicating that R1 and/or responsible party agreed that no valuables will be allowed to be stored or kept in the facility which is signed by R1's responsible party dated 07/11/18. Investigator Gaona with The San Gabriel Police Department indicated via telephone interview that their Department investigation was officially closed out with "no findings" in regards to the possible suspect of the alleged theft. Therefore, based on information obtained throughout the investigation there was no evidence found indicating that the facility failed to safeguard R1's personal belongings.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, clients, review of client files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Telephonic exit interview held, and a copy of this report was emailed to Administrator for signature. |