1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the Allegation: Staff pulled resident’s ear.
This complaint alleged that staff pulled R1 ear and R1 ear was injured. LPA Calderon toured the facility and did not witness any negative interactions between staff and residents. Records review indicate the following: Physician report indicate verbal resident with health issues. Individual Service Plan (ISP) indicates that R1 can communicate R1 needs and is not conserved. Facility annual report indicates that R1 is happy living at the facility and loves the day program. Incident report indicates that on 04/02/2025 R1 family member asked staff member to cut R1 hair and when staff member was cutting R1 hair R1 moved R1 head and R1 ear was cut. R1 was not taken to the hospital and antibiotic was used. Interviews indicate the following: 3 out of 3 staff deny pulling R1 ear. W1 indicates that R1 advised W1 that staff had pulled R1 ear for unknown reasons. W1 indicates that W1 did ask staff to cut R1 hair. R1 indicates that R1 does not remember the date of the incident but that staff pulled R1 ear and injured R1 ear. R1 indicates that R1 ear has healed. 2 out of 3 residents deny any staff member pulling R1 ear. Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff pulled residents ear” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the Allegation: Staff do not treat resident with respect.
This complaint alleged that staff yelled and called R1 names for unknown reason. LPA Calderon toured the facility and did not witness any negative interactions between staff and residents. Records review indicate the following: Physician report indicate verbal resident with health issues. Individual Service Plan indicates that R1 can communicate R1 needs and is not conserved. Facility annual report indicates that R1 is happy living at the facility and loves the day program. Interviews indicate the following: 3 out of 3 staff deny the allegation that staff do not treat R1 with respect. W1 indicates that R1 advised W1 that staff had yelled at R1 and called R1 names for unknown reasons. R1 indicates that all staff treat R1 with respect. 2 out of 3 residents indicate that all staff treat them with respect. Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff does not treat resident with respect” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited during today's visit.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report were provided to the Administrator Thana Theng (S1). |