1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Facility is refusing to pick up resident from the hospital:
On 7/8/20 at 1:55 PM and on 7/17/20 the Administrator Charlette Ofrecio was interviewed regarding the allegation. The Administrator denied refusing to accept the resident back from the hospital. She stated the resident had a change in condition and was being discharged from the hospital with a Catheter. The Administrator stated she reviewed Title 22 and determined the resident needed a higher level of care until the catheter could be removed. The Administrator stated she was working with R1’s family to either temporarily relocate R1 or request an exception from CCL. On 7/8/2020, R1 Responsible Party was interviewed regarding the allegation and stated the facility did not refuse to accept R1 back. She sated they were working with her because R1 had a Catheter. On 7/8/2020, SW was interviewed and stated the facility never evicted R1 but stated they must adhere to Tittle 22 regarding the Catheter. SW stated initially the doctor wanted R1 to go to a Skilled Nursing Facility Temporarily, but the family refused. The doctor stated the resident could return to the facility with Home Health and a 24-hour Caregiver, but the facility stated they would have to get permission from CCL. Estimated date was 7/10/20 R1 was discharged and stayed with family until 7/16/2020. On 7/16/2020 R1 Catheter was removed and R1 has returned to the facility.
Based on interviews and documentation during the investigation Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated or unfounded
A telephonic exit interview was conducted with the administrator and hard copy was provided via email for records
|