1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Staff did not pick up resident in a timely manner after hospitalization. It is alleged that on 02/28/2026, C1 reported arm pain and threats of self-harm, leading to a 72-hour hold at the hospital by the PET team. The hold ended on 03/02/2026 at 10:30 am, but C1 was not picked up around 10:30pm due to staff shortages. Staff interviewed corroborated the allegation stating that C1 was taken to the hospital on 02/28/2026. Due to C1's self-harm statements, the PET team assessed C1 and was placed on a 72-hour hold, which was lifted by the psychiatrist on 03/02/2026, at about 10:30am. The hospital called to request a pick-up around 11am, but the administrator stated they had only one staff member available until 3pm. The hospital called back at 3pm but was told there were still no staff available. C1 was finally picked up around 10:30pm. Documents reviewed revealed that on 03/01/26 at 6:37am, administrator told staff assigned to C1 not to come in on 03/01/2026 and 03/02/2026 due to C1 on a 72-hour hold, indicating a lack of staff to pick up C1 in a timely manner. Based on interviews, C1 should have been picked up immediately or within a reasonable time frame, not 12 hours later. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Allegation: Staff did not follow the facility IPP resulting in client ingesting a foreign object. It is alleged that staff failed to provide supervision and failed to implement the Individual Behavior Support Plan/IBSP for C1 and C2 on (2) separate occasions. Staff interviewed corroborated the allegation and confirmed that on 02/21/2026, C2 went to the park with a staff member (later resigned from their position), who was reportedly on the phone. C2 admitted to inhaling marijuana wax vape while staff was not watching. Another incident occurred on 02/28/26, involving C1, who reported arm pain and later threatened self-harm while saying they had swallowed a metal object. C1 was then transported to the hospital for evaluation, where it was confirmed that C1 had swallowed a dime. Although the staff reported maintaining a line of sight, they could not explain how C1 swallowed the dime, indicating staff did not maintain proper supervision. C2 corroborated the allegation. Documents reviewed as well as interviews revealed that staff did not supervise C1-C2 adequately to ensure their safety. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Based on interviews, and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Vanessa Garcia, Asst. Administrator along with the Appeal Rights.
|