1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | *****This is an amended version of the report dated 11/02/2022. The report was amended to clarify statements and information regarding physical restraints. No other changes have been made to the report. Investigation findings remain the same.*****
Regarding the allegation: Staff are inappropriately restrained a client while in care.
LPA's interviews with S1-4 revealed that this allegation did not happen. S1-4 denied that this occurred. S2 stated that she did not use any form of physical restraints to C1 as alleged. Staff are trained to apply different procedures and techniques like Crisis Prevention Intervention (CPI) if client is being physically aggressive. The physical restraint plans and strategies are outlined on the client's behavior support plan which are signed and approved by the authorized representatives and the client. S2 indicated that C1 has a history of making up allegations and then recanting statement. S2 stated that multiple times C1 said that S2 was her favorite staff, but if she doesn’t get S2's attention, it upsets her. S3 stated that if the client is being violent or a threat to himself/herself or the staff, they are encouraged to keep their distance or block or redirect them. S3 stated it is their way of intervention without violence. S3 also stated that the staff talk to the clients and they help out by listening to them as they want attention and be heard. S1 stated that he remembered an incident where C1 reported to the Day Program that she did not know where she got the bruise on her abdomen or what happened, but she recanted her story. S1 stated that paramedics came one day and injected C1's stomach with Narcan. C2-3 stated that they did not hear or see this incident about C1 being restrained. C2-3 stated that they never experienced being restrained in the facility. C1 stated that she remembered reporting this allegation to the Day Program, but she recanted it. C1 stated that she was never restrained by any staff in the facility and the allegation did not happen. C1 indicated that she likes living in the facility and has no issues. LPA reviewed the facility reports and did not observe or found evidence to corroborate this allegation.
Based on the observation, interviews conducted and record reviews, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the House Lead, Christian Rodriguez.
|