1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigation Revealed the Following:
Allegation: Facility allowed resident t to be restrained.
The details of the complaint alleged that facility did not follow (R#1)’s doctors’ orders on restrains.
On May 29, 2025, at approximately 3:00 PM, during a records review, LPA Iniguez examined the facility file for (R#1). Within this file, LPA Iniguez found copies of Nurse Practitioner (NP) orders related to restraints. The first order dated January 9, 2025, states that it is permissible for (R#1)’s family to apply a nighttime restraint, provided by (R#1)’s family. The family assumes responsibility for any adverse occurrences and risks discussed with the care facility. Additionally, LPA Iniguez found another NP restraint order dated February 7, 2025, which instructs to discontinue all restraints that had been placed on (R#1) by the family.
On May 29, 2025, at approximately 10:00 a.m., during an interview with the Administrator (A#1), she stated that the facility always follows the orders of the residents’ doctors or Nurse Practitioners. In addition, (A#1) stated that yes, we follow the Nurse Practitioner (NP) order for restraints regarding (R#1). The family is supposed to put the restraints on at night, and we will remove them in the morning. The order was discontinued by the (NP) after a month.
On May 29, 2025, at approximately 3:00 PM, during interviews with residents (R#1-R#7), (7) out of (7) stated that they received their medical orders from their physician here at the facility. Additionally, (7) out of (7) residents in care stated that they believe the facility staff follow the orders as prescribed by their physician.
On May 29, 2025, at approximately 1:00 PM, during interviews with facility staff (S#1-S#3), (3) out of (3) stated that (R#1) had a prescribed order for restrains. They followed the order as noted by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) until it was discontinued on 2/7/25.
Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C |