1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During today's visit, LPAs obtained the following documents: staff and client rosters.
The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation " Staff did not prevent client from having a sexually inappropriate interaction with another client in care.” It is alleged that C1 knocked on C2’s bedroom door while C2 was laying in bed and C2 allowed C1 to enter. C1 walked to the bed putting C1 on top of C2 and began thrusting C2 and C2 was uncomfortable and C2 told C1 not to do that anymore. LPAs interviewed Admin, S1 and S3 and all corroborated with the allegation. All staff interviewed stated that the incident occurred and that C1 has had incidents of inappropriately touching that cause clients and staff to feel uncomfortable. One of the staff interviewed witnessed C1 inappropriately touching another client in the private area. The staff interviewed also stated that C1 continues to caress the staff’s hand whenever medication is administered to C1. One of staff also stated feeling uncomfortable when C1 tries to hug every staff whenever the staff leaves the home. Two (2) out of four (4) clients interviewed corroborated with the allegation. One (1) out of four (4) clients stated that there have been prior incidents of C1 inappropriately touching another client. These clients indicated feeling uncomfortable by C1’s inappropriate and unwanted touching. One of the clients stated being touched in their behind and legs area by C1 and told C1 to stop doing that. Two (2) out of four (4) clients interviewed denied the allegation. C1 stated that C1 only handshakes or high fives the clients and staff.
W1 also corroborated with the allegation and stated that C1 has behaviors of touching inappropriately other persons so C1 has been encouraged to attend a program to help educate in appropriate communication and social interactions.
Based on LPAs interviews which were conducted interviews and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED.
An exit interview was conducted with the S4. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.
|