1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation reveals the following: Regarding “Resident was sexually abused while in care”. It is alleged that R1 was sexually assaulted by R2. The Executive Director (ED) stated this is the second time R1 has made this allegation, and it is during the times the facility has construction. The ED further stated R1 claims R2 lives about their room but R2 lives on the other side of the building. 2 out of 2 staff stated R1 and R2 were friends when R2 first moved in. When R2 started to distance themselves from R1 they noticed R1 started making allegations against R2. Staff further stated that there were other allegations R1 made against R2 but R2 was not around R1. 5 out of 11 residents stated R2 is a nice and respectful person. 4 out of 11 residents stated they don’t know R1 or R2. R1 stated in their interviews with IB investigator that someone in the facility is trying to hurt them but would not elaborate. R2 denied the allegation. LPA reviewed IB’s report from Cerritos College Police department. While the police visited there were thumping noises coming from the ceiling and stated R1 stated R2 was in the room because of those noises. R1 also told the police they were assaulted 3-4 times in the past 4 years but R1 was not living in the facility for 4 years at the time. LPA reviewed R1’s medical records and observed R1 has a diagnosis and a history of dementia and confusion. R1 has since relocated to another facility, needing a higher level of care.
The investigation reveals the following: Regarding “Staff did not ensure resident had privacy”. It is alleged that R2 sprays themselves through R1’s vent and is listening in on R1’s phone conversation. The Executive Director (ED) denied the allegation stating the residents have their privacy and R2 lives on the other side of the building. The ED further stated staff knocks and wait for acknowledgment 3 times before entering the resident’s rooms. 2 out of 2 staff confirmed the ED’s statement. 10 out 11 residents stated they have enough privacy while living in the facility.
Based on LPA's interviews, observation, and file review the investigation revealed that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview was conducted with Laura Rodriguez Executive Director and a copy of this report was provided.
|