1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding Allegation #1: Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner. It is being alleged that staff did not assist R1 in the dining room in a timely manner. The interviews indicate: S1 indicates that S1 staff are trained to take care of residents needs in a timely manner. S1 indicates that the facility does not keep call button log notes but on average staff takes 5 to 10 minutes to respond to a resident pushing the call button. 3 out of 3 staff indicate that when a call button is pushed by a resident it takes 5 to 10 minutes for staff to respond and take care of the resident’s needs. R1 indicates that R1 has no issues with staff taking care of R1 needs and R1 never made a complaint for staff not responding in a timely manner. R2-R3 indicate that when they press the call button it takes staff 10 minutes to respond and take care of their needs. R4-R5 could not answer any questions due to health issues. W2 indicates that R1 was in the dining room and staff did not respond to the call button within 30 minutes. W2 asked reporting party to check in on R1 and reporting party indicated to W2 that R1 advised reporting party that R1 was in the dining room and staff took 30 minutes to take care of R1 needs. Reviewed Physician Report (date 11/24/2023) for R1. R1 has cognitive issues.
Based on interviews, observations and supporting documents. The preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met; therefore, the allegation of “Staff did not assist resident in a timely manner” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A face-to-face meeting was conducted with Staff Michael Saucedo, and a hard copy was provided.
|